水草情迷

聯合國決定於 2008 廢除繁體 中文.

想想我們老祖先千年留給我們的姓名也將因簡體而變形, 中華文化遺產的摧毀不僅發生在中國, 也行將全世界, 可能以後要讀繁體字只能在日本, 這多諷刺呀!現在全球才 28 萬多人投反對票….要加油!
請大家上網去投票吧，謝謝 !
投票步驟:

1. 點下方網頁進 入
2. 滑動轉軸到下方一點的地方 , 點Sign the petition
3. 填寫資料 (因為很 多人不會填寫英文資料 , 投票就會變少 , 請你看得懂英文 的 朋友幫忙填寫吧 !)
4. 送出即成
5. 轉寄給其他朋友

http://www.gopetition.com/region/237/8314.html

就快五十萬喇~!

_________________
http://www.aqugrass.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=39365
我的魚缸資料(2008-5-13更新)

"Simplified Chinese, although convenient, fails to incorporate meaning into its characters. Many words of same phonetic sounds are replaced by a single character that possesses the same sound but lacks in meaning. The major downfall of Simplified Chinese is that it lacks meaning. Currently, historical texts are in Traditional Chinese, (simply because one can read and understand based on the author's choice of words) however, if Traditional Chinese is to be replaced by Simplified Chinese, one would not be able to understand these texts/writings because words have lost their meanings, they simply represent a way of pronouncing the texts. As time progresses, this would result in the loss of history and culture."


this is totally wrong from a linguistic point of view. linguists and especially sociolinguists agree that the phonetic system and word meaning level of simplified chinese are great and there is no the so-called "lost the meaning". this relates to an even deeper questions about the realtion of language and thoughts.

i am just pointing out the flaws but expressing my own opinion whether i stand for tra. chin or simplified chin.

please view language in a linguistic point of view but not other views. linguistic is the study of language in a scientific ways.

呢編野都傳左好耐,其實目的係收集網民資料

絕對認同! 其實如果繁體中文要廢除,咁好多歐洲同非洲既語言行先都未到繁體中文,因為大部分哩D語文都祗係一千幾百萬人用既語言,相對繁體中文,大部分既海外華人,台灣,香港,加加埋無一億都有幾千萬, 有排都未到啦!但無可否認係繁體既比例正在慢慢縮小,如果我們作為其中一個應用者都唔好好應用,不出百年,繁體將會成為好似篆書,甲骨文咁成為古字。真想不到簡體出現祗有短短半個世紀,經過兩個新生代既學習就將過千年既文化改變。可惜!!!!

_________________
"一起推動水族設景潮流, 集思廣益, 雅俗共賞。"
Life is to enjoy.....

i agree traditional chinese has a long history with abundant historical literatures but for a political and educational points of view, simplified chinese has its own advantages. for example, simplified chinese because as its simplicity, one can learn it in a more simple way and efficient way with its associated pinyin system, this can really help people learn it easier, just like the case of china, the reason why chinese government need to introduce the system is because it helps to reduce the illiteracy rate.

on one will abandon tra. chinese because traditional chinese has its own abundant historical literature, there is a linguistic group which helps to conserve languages in many ways including through the help of the united nations.

one can say a langauge is precious to a certain extent but one could not doubt the language itself is changing that because of the usage system in terms of phonology, syntax, sementicity and morphology are changing regarding how people use it.

同意jonhill兄的說法,一種語文的興衰與政治及當權者無不起直接或間接關係,如韓文的發明正是當時韓國君主的發興,而遠至泰始皇的統一文字,無不和一國的政策有關,誰有權,誰定改變路向。但是否與以保留舊有的文體或是否新有的文體比舊的一定易學或是否一定要去比較,就祗有是政策的推行者可以左右,我們祗有跟從。用那個文體最終都是看誰有主政的能力,說不定明天出個主子,統一世界的文體也未定呀!(其實可能已經在比拼中,一東一西,當今已成兩分天下,國際共通語言是英語,而國際上最多人應用的是華語) ha!ha!

_________________
"一起推動水族設景潮流, 集思廣益, 雅俗共賞。"
Life is to enjoy.....

簡體字只有幾十年歷史
聯合國唔用都無辦法/資格去廢除繁體
我唔係太擔心
不過
如果將來香港D學生都唔學繁體而學簡體
我就真係絕食都要抗議吶

_________________

咁你可以準備絕食抗議了~

_________________
Yo ho...Yo ho...A pirate's life for me.....

繁簡都系中文字，都系大中華文化，只系中文繁簡都支持！有 D 人真係系都要搞分化！唔明

唔係搞分化 , 你中意寫繁體字咪寫lo
~~~~~~
聯合國一早就用緊簡體中文啦... =.=
睇下d進口貨就知!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
同埋 , 好多小學生都番大陸買課外書睇...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
你地唔好咁out啦

_________________
Yo ho...Yo ho...A pirate's life for me.....

種類多得黎又平

不過o的翻譯小說真係睇唔慣...o的名...

_________________
http://www.aqugrass.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=39365
我的魚缸資料(2008-5-13更新)

猩猩王, 你都要update下喇!!!!
~~~~~~~~~

_________________
Yo ho...Yo ho...A pirate's life for me.....