水草情迷

其實我都係新手一名, 初初學人整水草缸, 亂咁買o野, 整到一 "PET" o野咁, 後尾的起心肝大反缸, 反缸前梗係收足料, 預備好一切先做o野, 一日o係元朗經過間新開水族店, 見佢門口有缸草幾好, 諗住入去吹兩句, 乘機偷下師, 吹得兩吹, 我就話我想大反缸, 老細就即時同我講: "細佬, 如果你真係想養水草, 就要小心唔好比 D 藻類叢生. 一開始有, 就好惡搞嫁啦." 跟手就介紹我買包濾材, 然後話: "如果你已經有生藻, 我就唔會叫你買, 因為加左都冇用, 但係如果你諗住重新起過, 就一定要買啦, 藻呢家o野預防勝於治療呀.", 我初初梗係半信半疑啦, 不過見三十零蚊, 佢講得又好似幾語重深長咁, 而且齋吹唔買o野又好似唔係咁好, 買就買啦.

整完個缸到而家兩個月度, 除青苔外暫時都冇黑毛藻o既出現, 係之前見過下 D 絲藻, 不過後尾 D 水草越生越勁之後就唔係好覺有 lu, 我有個老友同我咁上下時間整缸, 已經要拖行馬(飛狐)同黑毛藻開戰lu. 問唔中聽 D 網友講開都好頭痕, 我記得睇過段 POST 重話 D 黑毛藻多到用埋o黎造景咁滯(慘得o黎都幾搞笑), 而我個24"缸暫時都重係得一條SAE(當然如果有貨返我都會買多一兩條, 有備無患嘛, 但係就唔駛咁急 lu), 反而金青苔就有兩條, 其實我都唔肯定係唔係o個包防藻濾材起作用, 因為影響因素太多, 只不過想分享下等其他想開水草缸o既網友可以多個參考, 試過如果得o既又分享下咁, 咁就大家唔駛咁頭痕啦.

此段文字絕無廣告成份, 而且我都賣唔倒廣告, 因為o個包o野個盒我都掉埋, 牌子我又無為意, 不過如果有需要我都可以問番個老細o既(因為當時我問o既問題多到我諗佢呢一世都認得我).

多謝收看!

防藻瀘材?? 係唔係一粒粒白色嫁??

我印象中好似啡色. 不過我都唔係好肯定....

而家以很多人唔再用吸走磷或硝酸來防藻的方法了， 新的方法是保持磷及硝酸在對草有益的濃度， 以草防藻。 不過香港尼

「我流」
由佢生藻，有藻就唔餵佢地，d sae 就會食鬼曬d 藻...........

Macbrush兄: 你講 D o野比較深, 我唔係好識

Macbrush 兄講嘅方法係類似密植法，
藻係因為缸中太多養份，d 草用唔切所以先會生出泥，健康自然嘅方法就係種到夠草arm arm 好可以平衡地用曬缸中養份，就唔會有藻
要d skill 嫁

O....I see...I see.... 釘橋啡梨乜廚.

hey~
你的 "釘橋啡梨乜廚"
呢句野睇到我一時頭爆, 唔好再玩d哽ge野oh
知ma

p.s 其實我都有聽過黑毛藻好頑強
以前個舊缸用左3個幾月都無, 反而在濾水器上有絲藻
拿來餵魚都好似幾好的 , 我見佢地都好似食得幾滋味呢

咁米好LO!!CHEERS!!

方法當然要密植水草， 但重點是保持 NO3 和 PO4 在一個較高的水平， 一般 NO3 都會是 10 ppm 或以上， 而 PO4 約在 0.5 ppm - 2 ppm 之間。

I don't understand...............if NO3 and PO4 are at high level......there will be no reason the algae can not grow well, even the 水草s are 密植ed...........
Since in my knowledge, 密植ed 水草s can absorb excess nutrients including NO3 and PO4, so that algae cannot grow without enough nutrient............
Is there any new theory behind?

Yes, in fact many ppl (including myself) now keep NO3 and PO4 in amber supply. NO3 isn't new, its been around for many years, even in the old PMDD formula that suggested to add KNO3 along with trace elements, but PO4's only been repositioned as an important beneficial element in last couple of years, and do not cause algae in a way as we used to think.Sean & Colin's paper still has its place, but only in certain specific situations, such as the one they used in the testing.

I don't fully understand the theory behind it, but it seems that Phosphate limiting method has a negative effect on limiting plant growth as well, while increasing Phosphate level to certain level, i.e. 0.5 ppm - 1 ppm is recommended, boosted plant growth will somehow inhabit algae growth even better than by limiting phosphate supply.

Sorry, I don't understand this part.........

我意思是說磷並不如我們以前所想的那樣有便當然會起藻。 Sears (之前串錯) & Colin's paper 係首先把無磷防藻方法理論化的文章， 而現在以發現磷無錯是會"野"藻， 但並不是沒有磷便是最好的， 有一定份量 (份量比 paper 著建議的高很多) 的磷帶來的好處足夠令植物自然而更有效地和藻類競爭， 創造出能更有效控制藻類生長， 植物更健康的環境。