Boris 寫:
Hum... 滿意?
Maybe people's standard differ...
Boris,
我們作為成年人，必須學會尊重人，(您也希望人尊重您，對嗎!!)我個人覺得ArthurTang的缸十分好看(比我的垃圾缸好)
George Booth 1995寫的可以說出我的想法‧
http://www.thekrib.com/Plants/Tech/lighting.html#8引言回覆:
Success criteria
- ----------------
A "successful" plant tank can mean almost anything. Newbies may be
satisfied if the plants don't die right away. Casual aquarists might
be happy of the plants stay green and they don't have to weed the
tanks every month and don't need to mortgage the house to buy
fertilizers. Enthusiasts want actual growth and propagation so they
can impress their friends and win HAP points. Fanatics like me want
massive growth and aren't happy unless the plants are supersaturating
the tank with O2 and can be harvested for sale at plant auctions to
pay for the high tech products being used.
The oft-maligned Kevin Osborne is perfectly happy with his smattering
of non-demanding plants. I would be bored to tears.
I wonder if we could develop some objective terms to describe our
successes? Somehow I think the results obtained with a gro-lux and
cool white bulb and a bag of breath are different than results
obtained with obscenely expensive triton and ultra trilux bulbs and
automated CO2 injection. Both techniques are satisfying to their
proponents but need to be quantified somehow for someone trying to
decide which route to go.
登入
註冊
問答集
