水草情迷

真係唔明!!!可能我真係見識少啦
佢話香港政府要"加稅減赤"!!
新聞話佢買車稅局就會少收五萬!!
佢就話唔好意思... ...會損十萬蚊俾香港公益金... ...好偉大!

根據二○○一至○二年度稅務局年報話:
"捐款予免稅慈善團體可獲稅項扣減，上限為應評稅入息或利潤或入息總額的10%。"

咁係唔係最終稅局都係少收左稅款呢?

[glow color=red]而我地加稅就政府減赤,佢損錢就可交番少D稅啦?!! [/glow]:-n02

佢地之前計錯數, 點止 5萬咁少,
現在計出來係 19萬, 再 double 係 38萬!
恭喜恭喜, 恭喜那些慈善團體!

現在大家都明白為何咁多有錢人, 上等人 咁喜歡做善事啦!
正所為, 一舉兩得!

Total loss by the government:

Car registration tax = $190,000

Salaries tax paid by Ah Chung = $380,000 * 15% = $57,000

Total loss = $247,000.

Suggestion for Ah Chung : Another excuse to raise tax!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

應該0甘計至0岩:

政府少收 $190,000+($380,000*17%)=$254,600
阿松多比 $380,000-($380,000*17%)=$315,400
慈善團體無端端多收 $380,000

0甘至0岩!

Hey,

Given Ah Chung earns an annual income of several million (exclusive of his personal business of course), he should subject to standard rate (15%), instead of the progressive rate (17%). Right???

to: GGTH,

You are correct. Ah Chung should be paying tax at the standard rate, i.e. no deduction at all. There is no loss for the tax collectors.

Hi Peter_au88,

Just wondering what do you mean by "no deduction at all". I recall that no deduction should be applied to allowances, but other deductions can still be ranked for deductions even the taxpayer have to pay standard rate tax, such as Approved Charitable Donations, MPF, etc.....

Hence, there is loss for the tax collectors.

Please correct if I am wrong. (Any recent amendments to the Ordinance?)

唔鐘意佢話加稅減赤就得,而佢就冇對稅收做到有正面既行為!!

另外有冇人知哩次加稅,對魚價又有冇影響呢?(入口稅等):-n02

GGTH,

你0岩, sorry, 我攪錯.

Francis,

OK OK no problem. Just discussion - 心情舒發區 ma

But my computation assumes that Ah Chung earns an annual income of $3,800,000 or more. Otherwise, the deduction is limit to 10% of assessable income!!!!

Ah Chung is a 30% sneaky 70%dump FU@K, period.

Should have been dumb instead of dump