水草情迷

綜合水族資訊討論區
留言室 | 相片分享區 | 草圖-我的相簿
現在的時間是 2025-02-03 07:11

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 02:50 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2002-06-19 23:40
文章: 33
來自: 香港
草缸是否真的不可用底喉? 用底喉或隔屎板的影嚮在那呢? :j


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 08:34 
離線

註冊時間: 2002-04-30 14:06
文章: 221
來自: Kowloon City
It is a never ending debatable question, some say it is good for plants, some say it will wash away the nutrients......

But one practical concern is, the UGF is very hard to clean especially if clogged.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 09:22 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2002-05-28 18:16
文章: 412
來自: 香港南區
Agree with JJK, If the fish population is not big, UGF might work better. Also someone will use reverse UGF (water ejecting from the bottom).

The advantage of both method is it increase the water circulation (oxygen and fertilizer) in the substrate which benefits the root development. However if the dirt is too much (too many fish), the rate of consumption of the dirt is less than the rate of decomposition and absorption by plant, than the UGF will be in great trouble (the filtration fuction lost completely and become a poison generation bed).

The conclusion is it can, but it is not easy to keep it running well for long time. Unless you have time to monitor it very closely.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 17:11 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2002-06-19 23:40
文章: 33
來自: 香港
底床沒有對流,會否造成根部缺氧腐爛的情況?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 17:15 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2002-06-19 23:40
文章: 33
來自: 香港
是否同泥的性質有關呢?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 17:53 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2002-05-28 18:16
文章: 412
來自: 香港南區
Even there is no UGF type of filter, there is still small circulation of water inside the soil, as there are gaps between soil particles. The water movement above the soil and the slight temperature different between different level of soil / water level enable 'micro' circulation. In addition, the movement of small living being - snail inside the soil will also help the circulation of water inside the soil. I think most of the commerically available aquarium soil won't have the problem of
根部缺氧腐爛 in the first year of use.

If the size of soil is or become very fine i.e. clay, aged soil the problem of 根部缺氧腐爛 is likely to occur.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-06-29 18:00 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2001-10-11 08:00
文章: 2592
來自: Europa
>底床沒有對流,會否造成根部缺氧腐爛的情況?

Yes, that's why you either need heat coil or constantly uproot and replant.

On the other hand, the debate is most over lately. 99% of people, if not all, agree with that if you fertilize with any kind of based fertilizer, which you would have to in highlight, and CO2 tank, you must avoid UGF, or RUGF.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-07-02 15:39 
離線

註冊時間: 2002-04-06 02:45
文章: 394
來自: 魚則魚涌
I am also try (planning) to work out UGF for Planted Tank~~~

but really have lots of problem to solve with~~


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
未閱讀文章發表於 : 2002-07-03 07:46 
離線
頭像

註冊時間: 2001-10-11 08:00
文章: 2592
來自: Europa
I tried that before, most easy plants do good, some thrive. But demanding plants don't like that.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章
不能 在這個版面上傳附加檔案

前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作